HC directs TS to submit report on TSPSC members appointment

Share With

Hyderabad: The Telangana High Court on Monday directed the Telangana authorities to present complete data pertaining to the appointment of the six members to the Telangana State Public Service Commission (TSPSC), together with the variety of purposes/bio knowledge obtained from eligible candidates, the variety of purposes shortlisted, and whether or not any sub-committee comprised of Cabinet ministers.

Hearing a petition in opposition to the appointment of the six members, a division bench comprising Chief Justice Ujjal Bhuyan and Justice C.V. Bhaskar Reddy directed Advocate General B.S. Prasad to present the excellent data by the subsequent listening to on November 28.

It needs to be famous {that a} petition was filed in opposition to the appointment of the six members to the TSPC, claiming that their appointment was in direct violation of TSPSC Regulations 3(2)(a) and three(2)(b). Regulation 3(1) of the Regulations states that each one TSPSC members needs to be eminent people of excessive calibre and competence, however the authorities appointed these members in violation of the laws and at its discretion.

Earlier, the courtroom ordered the AG to present the report of the process for appointing the mentioned members. The AG supplied the courtroom with the report on TSPSC member appointments in sealed cowl, as directed by the courtroom. After reviewing the confidential report supplied by the AG, the Bench inquired concerning the notification issued to fill the positions and the process adopted. Chief Justice Ujjal Bhuyan acknowledged, “We are all members of the public. We want a robust Public Service Commission.”

Senior counsel Sudharshan Reddy, who’s representing R. Satyanarayana, one of many TSPSC’s six members, knowledgeable the HC that he’s a newspaper reporter and writer who has revealed three books on the surroundings and its impression on villages and agriculture. The senior counsel additionally knowledgeable the courtroom that Satyanarayana had performed some environmental and water analysis.

On an earlier listening to, the counsel for the petitioner introduced to the courtroom’s consideration {that a} scribe working on the district stage had been appointed as a TSPSC member, and he had raised considerations about how a reporter working on the district stage may take part within the choice technique of officers working on the state stage. In gentle of this, Satyanarayana’s counsel offered his case to the courtroom on Monday.

Chief Justice Ujjal Bhuyan, on the opposite hand, questioned whether or not Satyanarayana had utilized to the federal government for the place of member or not. “Why did the government choose only Satyanarayana for the post when there are so many other eminent persons in this field?” requested the courtroom.

Source link


Share With

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *